Saw this news piece from Channel 5 and thought I would share it here:
Britain Over the Limit: Would you drink a bottle that comes with a graphic health warning?
Interesting news piece: £800 million a year is spent on advertising by the big drinks companies within the UK!! The man from Diageo, the largest spirits manufacturers, pushes it back to personal responsibility as ‘demonising the product to everybody is not the solution’.
OK fair enough, then you won’t mind us sticking a picture of a cirrhotic liver on the side of a bottle of wine or spirits then. How do people take personal responsibility unless they have all the facts? In the medical world it’s called ‘informed consent’.
A poll carried out by Channel 5 found that 60% of those canvased thought it was a good idea. So if minimum pricing is off the table may we suggest this as an alternative then?
Would it have made/make a difference to your drinking if alcohol carried health warnings like cigarettes? What do you say? 🙂